Today I was finally in position to do
something I thought I'd never do. Something that music lovers have
been doing for four decades. I was able to buy a new David Bowie
album on its day of release!
I'm quite wary of listening to it. I
hate listening to things for the first time. I never trust my first
impressions. They're far too tempered by prejudice, precedence and
expectation. I much prefer the curve of gradual appreciation and the
ultimate feeling of warm familiarity to the shock of the new. This
doesn't mean that I'm adverse to trying new things. It's just that I
cannot think of a single album that means anything to me that
clicked immediately on the first listen. It takes time to absorb and
inhabit music. The first listen isn't something to be treasured. It's
something to get over with as soon as possible.
So I don't want to comment on David
Bowie's new album just yet. Nothing I say now can be at all trusted. But if you're really interested in what I think, come back to me in a
month or two.
I do believe, though, that there aren't
enough hours of existence remaining for me to ever learn to love the album cover.
The Next Day has one of the worst album
covers I've ever seen. A crude white box placed over the iconic
“Heroes” imagery. Whilst the image underneath has a lovely
silvery sheen to it, this still looks like the sort of thing that
could easily have been produced on MS Paint in less than a minute.
Things improve a little on the inside.
There's a black-on-black square that reminds me of the sort of
designs that adorn Autechre albums. It contrasts nicely with the
white square on the CD itself, creating a sort of triptych with
Bowie's moody disembodied head in the middle.
The lyrics are printed on a colourful
fold-out that somewhat resembles one of those posters you
used to get in those brown bags dotted around Manchester. In fact, on
the inside The Next Day is really quite beautifully designed.
Which makes me wonder – what was he thinking with that cover?
It may be awful to look at, but I don't
think it's devoid of meaning. The cover is horrible, but the inside
is striking. Is this a “comment” on the album itself? A sort of
“don't judge a book by its cover” message?
Or is it a sad statement concerning the
phasing-out of physical formats in favour of digital? As a collection
of MP3s, The Next Day's cover will only ever appear as a small
inscrutable square on a media player. Does Bowie think that people
have stopped pouring over album covers? Did he see no point in
putting any effort into album covers if they're ostensibly going to
be ignored?
Most likely, the cover of The Next Day
is probably supposed to represent some kind of interplay between the
past and the present, or between perception and reality. I wonder if
these themes are covered in the lyrics?
This is why I don't like initial
listens and why I don't trust first-impressions. There's always too much to
take-in.
In any case, the cover of The Next Day
is not exactly unprecedented. For one thing, it can be listed alongside Earthling
and certain editions of Lodger as an album on which Bowie's face
doesn't appear on the cover. Similarly, the artwork of 2002's Heathen
featured swathes of paint thrown against canvasses and pages torn
from books. The only difference, really, is that here Bowie's
sabotaging his own work rather than that of another artist.
So whilst the cover of The Next Day is
hideous, it's by no means without meaning. I therefore don't think it
can necessarily be described as “lazy” or “throwaway”. Just "ugly" and "unappealing".
As for the relative merits of the
music? I can't wait to find out!
What's best? This one or the one that Hard-Fi did? The one that said "NO COVER ART" on it.
ReplyDeleteThis one. If Hard-Fi's cover had a "message" it could only ever be read in a Nathan Barley voice.
ReplyDelete